Close Menu

Tag Archives: California

James Heiting cited by “Chicago Lawyer’s” Robert A. Clifford

By Heiting & Irwin |

I stood before 12 people, a cross-section of Miami-area residents who were to consider the case of a family who lost a loved one in a small plane that crashed off the coast as it attempted to take off. The cause of the crash was a defective part, manufactured by a local company whose… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

James Otto Heiting featured in the National Law Journal

By Heiting & Irwin |

Heiting & Irwin is proud to announce that James Otto Heiting has been featured in the National Law Journal’s recent article “Hard Times Make for Reluctant, Sometimes Angry, Jurors.” James Otto Heiting is the managing partner of Heiting & Irwin and has been practicing law since 1976. Mr. Heiting is admitted to practice before… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

WHAT TO DO AFTER A WORK RELATED INJURY?

By Heiting & Irwin |

The general and safe response is that all injuries should be handled the same way, however, that methodology may not be practical in the course of your work day. Any injury that causes you to believe that you need the care of a doctor should be reported immediately. The person(s) that is considered your… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

California Supreme Court Finds Liability for Tractor-Trailer Parked Along Freeway

By Heiting & Irwin |

On February 28, 2011, the California Supreme Court decided the case of Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Co. (Docket No. S178799). This is another case revolving around a deadly motor vehicle accident in which a tractor-trailer was involved. See my previous article here: In Cabral, Plaintiff’s husband, the decedent, was driving his pickup truck home… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

New California Case Holds Tractor-Trailer Drivers to Higher Standard

By Heiting & Irwin |

The California Court of Appeal for the First District (which includes San Francisco and neighboring areas), recently decided a case, [Lawson v. Safeway Inc., (2010) 191 Cal. App. 4th 400] holding drivers of tractor trailers to a higher standard than some other motorists. In the Lawson case, the plaintiffs were the driver of a… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

ARE YOU RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR DOG?

By Heiting & Irwin |

Animal bites are commonplace in our society. In many instances, a person bitten by a dog has a right to recover damages from the animal’s owner or other responsible party. California Civil Code Section 3342 states that the owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

PROTECTING A LITIGANT’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY

By Heiting & Irwin |

In today’s modern social environment, it has become increasingly important to manage one’s personal and private information in order to protect against identity theft, fraud, and the like. As participants in a lawsuit, plaintiffs and defendants alike are often required to disclose a great deal of personal information, including financial and medical documents, identification… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

DEMAND EQUAL PROTECTION

By Heiting & Irwin |

Equal protection is a clever and timely catch phrase and legal issue in these times of gay rights and mandatory health care. The issue also arises in the purchase and maintenance of UM/UIM (uninsured and underinsured) motorist coverage in the State of California. Following up on the prior blog re: UM/UIM coverage, automobile liability… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Tort Reform-Unintended Consequences

By Heiting & Irwin |

Tort Reform – Unintended Consequences Oftentimes, well intentioned legislation can have far-reaching and unintentional consequences. A great example of this is Civil Code § 3333.4 or “Prop 213” as it is commonly known among those in the field of personal injury litigation. Mr. Patterson, a client of mine and a retired factory worker, was… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn